Sensing system for verifying deadbolt engagement

ABSTRACT

A door lock detection system is disclosed. The system includes a magnet flexibly attached to a strike plate. The strike plate includes an opening. The magnet extends across the opening of the strike plate in a first orientation when a bolt does not extend into the opening of the strike plate. The magnet is configured to be deflected from the first orientation to a second orientation, distinct from the first orientation, in response to the bolt being extended into the opening of the strike plate. The system includes a magnetometer configured to detect one or more magnetic fields of the magnet that is flexibly attached to the strike plate in the first orientation and in the second orientation.

RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No.14/516,524, filed Oct. 16, 2014, entitled “Sensing System for VerifyingDeadbolt Engagement,” now U.S. Pat. No. 9,631,920, which claims priorityand benefit to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/891,885, filed Oct.16, 2013, entitled “Robust Sensing System for Verifying Engagement of aDeadbolt Bolt into a Deadbolt Strike Plate,” and to U.S. ProvisionalApplication No. 61/897,768, filed Oct. 30, 2013, entitled “RobustSensing System for Verifying Deadbolt Engagement Including Door AngleSensing Subsystem.” All of these applications are incorporated byreferenced herein in their entireties.

TECHNICAL FIELD

This relates generally to door locks, including but not limited tosensing systems for verifying deadbolt engagement.

BACKGROUND

As discussed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,950,033 to Guyre, entitled “Door BoltAlarm,” which is incorporated by reference herein, it is desirable forpurposes of home security and homeowner reassurance for a user to beable to know for certain whether a door to their home, such as a frontdoor, is properly closed and that the deadbolt is properly engaged.Security systems, building automation systems, and HVAC systems allbenefit from knowing the state of doors, such as whether they are openor closed, locked or unlocked, and the like. Several known deadboltsystems are able to verify that a bolt of the deadbolt system is eitherextended or retracted and are able to communicate this status in variousways to a user. However, the status of the bolt as being extended orretracted is not necessarily indicative of the true security state ofthe door. For example, it may be the case that the bolt is extended, butthat the door is still partially open. Moreover, many existing systemsrequire wiring to be installed in door frames and/or door jambs, whichcan be expensive and complicated to install and maintain.

Thus, existing systems cannot reliably verify that a door has indeedbeen shut and that the deadbolt has indeed been properly engaged.Moreover, existing systems are complex and often include a multitude ofsensors and require significant wiring.

SUMMARY

Accordingly, it would be desirable to provide a system that can reliablyverify that a door has indeed been shut and that the deadbolt has indeedbeen properly engaged. It would be further desirable to provide such asystem in a manner that does not require a high degree of complexity,does not require an inordinate number of sensors, and does not requirean inordinate number of wires.

In accordance with some embodiments, a door lock detection systemincludes a magnet flexibly attached to a strike plate (e.g., by spring,hinge, or combination thereof). The strike plate includes an opening.The magnet extends across the opening of the strike plate in a firstorientation when a bolt does not extend into the opening of the strikeplate. The magnet is configured to be deflected from the firstorientation to a second orientation, distinct from the firstorientation, in response to the bolt being extended into the opening ofthe strike plate. The door lock detection system also includes amagnetometer configured to detect one or more magnetic fields of themagnet that is flexibly attached to the strike plate in the firstorientation and in the second orientation.

In accordance with some embodiments, a method is performed by a doorlock detection system that has a magnet flexibly attached to a strikeplate. The strike plate includes an opening. The magnet extends acrossthe opening of the strike plate in a first orientation when a bolt doesnot extend into the opening of the strike plate. The magnet isconfigured to be deflected from the first orientation to a secondorientation, distinct from the first orientation, in response to thebolt being extended into the opening of the strike plate. The door lockdetection system also has a magnetometer configured to detect one ormore magnetic fields of the magnet that is flexibly attached to thestrike plate in the first orientation and in the second orientation; anda controller. The method includes detecting, with the magnetometer, oneor more magnetic fields of the magnet that is flexibly attached to thestrike plate; determining whether the detected one or more magneticfields correspond to the magnet being in the second orientation; andbased at least in part on determining that the detected one or moremagnetic fields correspond to the magnet being in the secondorientation, relaying, with the controller, to at least one other systeminformation that indicates that the bolt is engaged in the strike plate.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

For a better understanding of the various described embodiments,reference should be made to the Description of Embodiments below, inconjunction with the following drawings in which like reference numeralsrefer to corresponding parts throughout the figures.

FIG. 1A is a front view of a deadbolt assembly in accordance with someembodiments.

FIG. 1B is a side view of a deadbolt assembly in accordance with someembodiments.

FIG. 2A is a front view of a deadbolt assembly in accordance with someembodiments.

FIG. 2B is a side view of a deadbolt assembly in accordance with someembodiments.

FIGS. 3A-3B are perspective views of a deadbolt assembly in accordancewith some embodiments.

FIGS. 4A-4D are front views of a deadbolt assembly in accordance withsome embodiments.

FIGS. 5A-5D are side views of a deadbolt assembly in accordance withsome embodiments.

DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS

FIGS. 1A, 1B, 2A, and 2B illustrate a sensing system for verifying thata door is properly shut and that a deadbolt is properly engaged. Moreparticularly, FIGS. 1A and 1B illustrate front and side views,respectively, of a deadbolt assembly 102 mounted on a door 112 that hasbeen shut into a door jamb 116, wherein a bolt 104 of the deadboltassembly 102 is in a retracted state. As with conventional systems,there is a deadbolt face plate 114 affixed to the door 112, and adeadbolt strike plate 118 affixed to the door jamb 116. In someembodiments, there is provided a magnet 108 that is flexibly andspringably attached to the deadbolt strike plate 118, such as byflex/spring member 109, such that the magnet 108 extends across theopening of the deadbolt strike plate 118. In some embodiments, thedeadbolt assembly 102 is provided with a magnetometer 106. Themagnetometer 106 and the magnet 108 are mutually configured anddimensioned such that the magnetometer 106 can sense a change inorientation of the magnet 108. In particular, when the magnet 108 isdeflected, the magnetic field that is produced by the magnet iscorrespondingly deflected. In some embodiments, magnetic field readingsfrom the magnetometer 106 are compared against previous readings todetermine whether the readings correspond to a deflected magnetic field(e.g., resulting from the bolt 104 deflecting the magnet 108), or anundeflected magnetic field (e.g., resulting from the bolt 104 notdeflecting the magnet 108).

FIGS. 2A and 2B illustrate corresponding front and side views,respectively, of the sensing system of FIGS. 1A and 1B in which the bolt104 is in an extended state. FIGS. 3A and 3B illustrate perspectiveviews, FIGS. 4A-4D illustrate front views, and FIGS. 5A-5D illustrateside views of the sensing system in accordance with some embodiments. Asshown in FIGS. 2A and 2B, the magnet 108 has changed its orientation by90 degrees by virtue of the mechanical insertion of the bolt 104 throughthe opening of the deadbolt strike plate 118, an orientation change thatis detected by magnetometer 106. In some embodiments, this change inorientation is communicated from the magnetometer 106 to one or moreuser interfaces using a variety of different electronics andcommunications configurations, such as those described in Guyre, supra.

Advantageously, false engagement signals associated with the situationof an extended bolt but unclosed door are avoided, because the magnet108 will not change orientation in that case. Conversely, falseengagement signals associated with a situation of a rotated magnet 108but non-extended bolt (such as by a person sticking their finger intothe opening of the deadbolt strike plate) is also avoided, because ifthe door is not closed, then the magnetometer 106 will be too far fromthe magnet 108 to sense its orientation change. In some embodiments,false engagement signals are still further avoided by virtue of aseparate sensing system (not shown) onboard the deadbolt assembly 102for sensing whether the bolt has been extended (e.g., by opticalsensing, electrical bumper switch, magnetic sensing, etc.). In suchcases, the conclusion that the door has been closed and the deadboltlocked is reached when it is determined that both (a) the bolt has beenextended (e.g., as determined by the separate sensing system), and (b)the magnet 108 has changed its orientation (e.g., as determined by themagnetometer 106).

One example of a commercially available magnetometer suitable for usewith the present system is an ASAHIKASEI AKM AK8963 3-axis electroniccompass. In a calibration step in the locked position, the X, Y, and Zmagnetic fields reported by the magnetometer are measured. Within atolerance, when this same combination of fields is seen again (and,optionally, the bolt is known to be extended), it is determined that thedoor is securely locked. One example of a magnet that can be used is aNeodymium rare earth magnet, such as a Neodymium disc magnet havingdimensions of 0.5 inch diameter by 0.125 inch thickness.

The disclosed systems and methods use minimally invasive sensors toidentify if a deadbolt is properly engaged in a doorframe, as opposed tomerely detecting if the deadbolt is out but the door is not closed.Using a strike plate that mounts inside the doorframe, the bolt deflectsa magnet when the bolt is properly engaged into the strike plate. Oncethe door is locked (i.e., the bolt is extended through an opening of thestrike plate and into a door jamb), a magnetometer measures the magneticfield it senses. If the magnetometer senses a magnetic fieldsubstantially equivalent to the previously calibrated magnetic field(e.g., which corresponds to the magnetic field that is sensed when thebolt deflects the magnet in the latch in the doorframe), it isdetermined that the bolt is engaged properly in the doorframe and thatthe door is secured. A microcontroller relays this information to othersystems such as a door mounted notification light or alarm, a securitysystem, and/or a control panel. In some embodiments, the system is alsoconnected to an electromechanical door locking/unlocking mechanism.

The disclosed embodiments provide numerous advantages over conventionaldeadbolts. For example, as noted above, conventional deadbolts (evenelectromechanical ones) do not know if the bolt (when extended) actuallyextends into the door jamb securing the door; they just know if the boltis extended or retracted. In the disclosed embodiments, however, thereis no need for an electrical switch inside the door jamb to sense thatthe bolt is engaged. Rather, the sensor that determines whether the boltis engaged or not is external to the door jamb and strike plate (e.g.,it is coupled to a deadbolt assembly mounted to the door). Also, becausethere is no electrical switch, there is no need to run electrical wiresinside the doorjamb. Indeed, in some embodiments, the strike plate isretrofitted into existing door jambs without additional wiring.Furthermore, the disclosed embodiments do not require redesigningconventional bolts or locking mechanisms, as the magnet and magnetometerare agnostic to the particular locking mechanism being used. Indeed, thedisclosed embodiments will work well with both manually operated andelectromechanical door locks to provide feedback if the deadbolt isactually engaged.

In some embodiments, the deadbolt assembly 102 is further configured andadapted to sense the particular angle of the door (e.g., 0 degreescorresponding to a completely closed state, 10 degrees corresponding toa cracked or partially open state, 90 degrees corresponding to an openstate, and so forth). For example, a microelectromechanical system(MEMs) magnetometer mounted to a door senses door orientation (i.e.closed, open, partially open) by measuring changes in orientation withrespect to the earth's magnetic field or a reference magnetic field(e.g., a stationary a magnet or coil). In some embodiments, this MEMsmagnetometer can be one and the same as the magnetometer 106. For otherembodiments, the door-angle-sensing MEMs magnetometer is a separatemagnetometer than the magnetometer 106 provided with the deadboltassembly 102. In still other embodiments, the door-angle-sensing MEMsmagnetometer is mounted in a separate device or structure on the door.In addition to or as an alternative to the door-angle-sensing MEMsmagnetometer, a MEMs gyroscope (“gyro”) device is optionally included inthe deadbolt assembly 102 or otherwise mounted to a door for measuringthe angular rate of the door opening or closing. Knowing time, afterintegrating the gyro, the door's angular relative position from a knownstarting point is determined, thereby allowing determination of thedoor's absolute opening angle. By way of example and not by way oflimitation, examples of suitable MEMs gyros include the BOSCH BMG160,the ST LPY410A, and the ST A3G4250D.

Information regarding the door angle is useful in a variety of differentways. In some embodiments, the door angle information is used to verifythat the door is indeed properly closed (i.e., completely closed, asopposed to partially or fully open). Another use includes communicatingthe door angle to a user interface screen of a user, so that the usercan determine, from a remote location, whether and to what extent thedoor is open. Another useful application arises for doorways equippedwith a screen door, (i.e., a second door that allows air to pass in andout while also keeping out insects and other pests), or for other doorssuch as interior doors that affect air circulation in the house. In suchembodiments, the detected door angle is communicated to an HVAC systemfor any of a variety of useful purposes relating to the monitoring orgoverning of air flow in the home. Additionally, applications furtherinclude doors equipped with associated motors and linkages for achievingautomated opening and closing, where the door angle is used as part of afeedback control system.

What is claimed is:
 1. A door lock detection system, comprising: amagnetic field system configured to emit one or more magnetic fields,wherein: the magnetic field system comprises a strike plate and a bolt;the strike plate comprises an opening through which the bolt isconfigured to extend; the magnetic field system emits a first magneticfield in accordance with the bolt having a first position with respectto the opening of the strike plate; and the magnetic field system emitsa second magnetic field, distinct from the first magnetic field, inaccordance with the bolt having a second position with respect to theopening of the strike plate, wherein the bolt in the first position doesnot extend through the opening by more than a threshold amount, and thebolt in the second position extends through the opening by more than thethreshold amount; and a magnetometer system configured to detect, and todiscern differences between, the first magnetic field and the secondmagnetic field.
 2. The door lock detection system of claim 1, includinga controller that relays to at least one other system information thatindicates whether the bolt is engaged in the strike plate, wherein theinformation that indicates whether the bolt is engaged in the strikeplate is derived at least in part from the first magnetic field and thesecond magnetic field, detected by the magnetometer system, of themagnetic field system.
 3. The door lock detection system of claim 2,wherein the at least one other system is a security system, anotification alarm, a notification light, and/or a control panel.
 4. Thedoor lock detection system of claim 1, wherein the second magnetic fieldis equivalent, within a tolerance, to one or more magnetic fieldsmeasured, in a prior calibration step, by the magnetometer system whenthe bolt is engaged in the strike plate.
 5. The door lock detectionsystem of claim 1, including a bolt extension detector configured todetect whether the bolt is extended.
 6. The door lock detection systemof claim 1 including a door orientation sensor configured to detect anorientation of a door to which the bolt is coupled.
 7. The door lockdetection system of claim 6, wherein the door orientation sensor is amicroelectromechanical system (MEMs) magnetometer.
 8. The door lockdetection system of claim 7, wherein the MEMs magnetometer is the sameas the magnetometer system.
 9. The door lock detection system of claim6, wherein the door orientation sensor is a microelectromechanicalsystem (MEMs) gyroscope.
 10. The door lock detection system of claim 1,wherein the magnetometer system comprises a 3-axis magnetometer.
 11. Thedoor lock detection system of claim 1, wherein the strike plate isaffixed to a door jamb, and wherein the bolt and the magnetometer systemare coupled to the door.
 12. A method, comprising: at a door lockdetection system having: a magnetic field system configured to emit oneor more magnetic fields, wherein: the magnetic field system comprises astrike plate and a bolt; the strike plate comprises an opening throughwhich the bolt is configured to extend; the magnetic field system emitsa first magnetic field in accordance with the bolt having a firstposition with respect to the opening of the strike plate; and themagnetic field system emits a second magnetic field, distinct from thefirst magnetic field, in accordance with the bolt having a secondposition with respect to the opening of the strike plate, wherein thebolt in the first position does not extend through the opening by morethan a threshold amount, and the bolt in the second position extendsthrough the opening by more than the threshold amount; and amagnetometer system configured to detect, and to discern differencesbetween, the first magnetic field and the second magnetic field;detecting, with the magnetometer system, one or more magnetic fields ofthe magnetic field system; determining whether the detected one or moremagnetic fields correspond to the bolt having the second position withrespect to the opening of the strike plate; and based at least in parton determining that the detected one or more magnetic fields correspondto the bolt having the second position with respect to the opening ofthe strike plate, relaying to at least one other system information thatindicates that the bolt is engaged in the strike plate.
 13. The methodof claim 12, wherein the at least one other system is a security system,a notification alarm, a notification light, and/or a control panel. 14.The method of claim 12, wherein the second magnetic field is equivalent,within a tolerance, to one or more magnetic fields measured, in a priorcalibration step, by the magnetometer system when the bolt is engaged inthe strike plate.
 15. The method of claim 12, wherein the door lockdetection system includes a bolt extension detector configured to detectwhether the bolt is extended, the method including: detecting, with thebolt extension detector, whether the bolt is extended; based at least inpart on determining that the detected one or more magnetic fieldscorrespond to the bolt having the second position with respect to theopening of the strike plate and detecting that the bolt is extended,relaying, with the controller, to at least one other system informationthat indicates that the bolt is engaged in the strike plate.
 16. Themethod of claim 12, wherein the door lock detection system includes adoor orientation sensor configured to detect an orientation of a door towhich the bolt is coupled, the method including: detecting, with thedoor orientation sensor, whether the door is closed; and in response todetecting that the door is closed, sending an indication that the dooris closed to at least one electronic device.
 17. The method of claim 12,wherein the door lock detection system includes a door orientationsensor configured to detect an orientation of a door to which the boltis coupled, the method including: detecting, with the door orientationsensor, whether the door is closed; and based at least in part ondetermining that the one or more detected magnetic fields correspond tothe bolt having the second position with respect to the opening of thestrike plate and detecting that the door is closed, relaying, with thecontroller, to at least one other system information that indicates thatthe bolt is engaged in the strike plate.